Welcome to
                Family Law Consulting, PLLC

Back to Family Law Consulting

Expert Opinion in Family Law

Contact Family Law
                Consultants LLC
                        we are
About Dr. Garber
Keeping Kids Out Of The Middle
 Keeping families out of court
                        do you take care of yourself?

What is expert opinion?
Mental health professionals can be invited to contribute specialized knowledge to family litigation in the role of expert.

As expert is an impartial professional with no prior involvement with the parties to the particular matter. By contrast, a professional who is or has been involved with one or more family members (e.g., as child therapist, co-parenting counselor) may have tremendous expertise, but would participate in litigation as a fact witness.

A qualified mental health professional can serve as one of two types of experts.

(1) A testifying or testamentary expert will be called to the stand to educate the court in matters relevant to the particular litigation. This can be a purely abstract lesson in psychology (e.g., what is healthy child development? What is enmeshment? What is alienation?). It can include answers to hypotheticals (e.g., "If a 6-year-old wets the bed, what could that mean?"). It could offer an opinion based on a review of specific documents Read more

Dr. Garber will not interview, assess, or observe any individual when serving as a testifying expert. Although this may feel awkward to litigants, it is necessary to protect privilege.

(2) A non-testifying expert will not be called to testify. Instead, this mental health professional works with counsel and one litigant to prepare for examination and cross-examination. A non-testifying expert can meet with parties, review documentation, and critique other professionals' work. Read more here Read more

Dr. Garber brings almost four decades of experience as a psychologist providing therapies and evaluations to children and families across the full spectrum of experience.

Top of page Home
How much does this service cost?
Dr. Garber's work as either a testifying or non-testifying expert is charged by the hour inclusive of all activities, e.g., reviewing documents, conferring with counsel, travel.

Dr. Garber will specify the per hour charge and the necessary initial retainer in an initial Statement of Understanding delivered upon request. Total hours (and thereby costs) will vary based on the nature of the work such that working as a testifying expert educating the court without document review is likely to be less expensive than working as a non-testifying expert working with counsel to prepare for trial.

Top of page Home
As an expert, who does Dr. Garber work for?
Dr. Garber is employed by a lawyer in this role. The lawyer represents a litigating party (parent). Nevertheless, Dr. Garber retains the discretion to work in the best interests of the children.

In the interest of retaining impartiality and privilege, as a testifying expert Dr. Garber strongly prefers that payment is delivered from retaining counsel's office rather than from that lawyer's client.

Top of page Home
I want to learn more.
Read more here:
  • Lee, S. M., & Nachlis, L. S. (2011). Consulting with attorneys: An alternative hybrid model. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices, 8(1-2), 84-102.
  • Austin, W. G., Kirkpatrick, H. D. and Flens, J. R. (2011), The emerging forensic role for work product review and case analysis in child access and parenting plan disputes. Family Court Review, 49: 737–749.
  • Association of Family and Conciliation Courts and Child Custody Consultant Task Force (2011), Mental health consultants and child custody evaluations: A Discussion paper. Family Court Review, 49: 723–736.
  • Bow, J. N., Gottlieb, M. C., Gould-Saltman, Hon. D. J. and Hendershot, L. (2011). Partners in the process: How attorneys prepare their clients for custody evaluations and litigation.Family Court Review, 49: 750–759.
  • Mermelstein, H., Rosen, J. A. and Reinach Wolf, C. (2016), Best Interests of the Special Needs Child: Mandating Consideration of the Child's Mental Health. Family Court Review, 54: 68–80.

Top of page Home

For courts and judicial officers
For lawyers, attorneys and pro se
For Guardians ad litem
For forensic
                        family evaluators
For litigants

Caveat lector