Gould , J. W.
Martindale , D. A. (2007). The art and science
of child custody evaluations. New York: Wiley,
p. 87
|
Pickar, D. B. (2007). On being
a child custody evaluator: Professional and
personal challenges,
risks, and rewards. Family
Court Review, 45(1),
103-115.
|
Garber, Benjamin D.
(2021). Mending Fences: A collaborative,
cognitive-behavioral “reunification” protocol
serving the best interests of the post-divorce,
polarized child. Unhooked Media.
|
Harlow, Harry F (June,
1959). Love in Infant Monkeys. Scientific
American 200:68, 70-74
|
Kaslow, F. W., &
Schwartz, L. L. (1987). Frontiers in couples and
family therapy. The dynamics of divorce: A life
cycle perspective. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
|
Bala, A. Evans & E.
Bala, Hearing the Voices of Children in Canada’s
Criminal Justice System: Recognizing Capacity
and Facilitating Testimony (2010), 22 Child
& Family Law Quarterly 21-45.
|
Baumrind , D. H.
(1991). The influence of parenting style on
adolescent competence and substance use. Journal
of Early Adolescence, 11, 56-95.
|
Baumrind, D. H. (2013).
Is a pejorative view of power assertion in the
socialization process justified? Review of
General Psychology, 17(4), 420-427.
|
Wischerth, G. A.,
Mulvaney, M. K., Brackett, M. A., & Perkins,
D. (2016). The adverse influence of permissive
parenting on personal growth and the mediating
role of emotional intelligence. The Journal
of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on
Human Development, 177(5), 185–189.
|
King, K. A., Vidourek,
R. A., & Merianos, A. L. (2016).
Authoritarian parenting and youth depression:
Results from a national study. Journal of
Prevention & Intervention in the Community,
44(2), 130–139.
|
Trifan, T. A., Stattin,
H., & Tilton‐Weaver, L. (2014). Have
authoritarian parenting practices and roles
changed in the last 50 years? Journal of
Marriage and Family, 76(4), 744–761.
|
Shaw, Z. A., &
Starr, L. R. (2019). Intergenerational
transmission of emotion dysregulation: The role
of authoritarian parenting style and family
chronic stress. Journal of Child and Family
Studies, 28(12), 3508–3518
|
National Council of
Juvenile and family Court Judges (year?)
accessed 01.12.2022 at
http://www.ncjfcj.org/resource-library/publications/navigating-custody-and-visitation.
|
Garber, Benjamin D.
(2015). The Roadmap to The Parenting Plan
Worksheet. Unhooked Media. ISBN
978-1-936268-34-4.
|
Berg v. Berg 152 NH 658
2005 (New Hampshire Supreme Court published
opinion)
|
Indiana Rules of Court.
Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines Including
Amendments Received Through January 1, 2022.
Accessed 01.12.2022 at
https://www.in.gov/courts/rules/parenting/index.html
|
https://www.lgtlegal.com/news/Is-the-Right-of-First-Refusal-a-Good-Idea-for-Child-Custody-Agreements-_168news.htm#:~:text=Can%20the%20%E2%80%9CRight%20of%20First,cooperative%20and%20well%20intentioned%20parents.
|
Association of Family
and Conciliation Courts. (2005). Guidelines for
parenting coordination. Association of
Family and Conciliation Courts .
|
Garber, Benjamin D.
(2004). Directed co-parenting intervention:
Conducting child centered interventions in
parallel with highly conflicted co-parents.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,
35(1), 55-64.
|
Association of Family
and Conciliation Courts. (2006). Model standards
of practice for custody evaluation. Association
of Family and Conciliation Courts.
|
Association of Family
and Conciliation Courts. (2022). Guidelines
for parenting plan evaluations in family law
cases. Association of Family and Conciliation
Courts.
|
https://ocfs.ny.gov/programs/cwcs/assets/docs/Blue-Ribbon-Commission-Report-2022.pdf
|
Saini, M., & Polak,
S. (2014). The ecological validity of
parent-child observations: A review of empirical
evidence related to custody evaluations. Journal
of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and
Practices, 11(3), 181–201.
|
Dale, M. D., &
Smith, D. (2021). Making the case for
videoconferencing and remote child custody
evaluations (RCCEs): The empirical, ethical, and
evidentiary arguments for accepting new
technology. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,
27(1), 30–44.
|
American Bar
Association (2021). Model Rules of Professional
Conduct. Accessed 01.12.2022 at Model Rules of
Professional Conduct (americanbar.org)
|